The Best Buildings from Three Decades?

Submit A Comment | View Comments

Le Corbusier, Saint-Pierre church, Firminy, France. Could a 1963 design be the most significant building of the 21st century?


Like David Letterman, or John Cusack in High Fidelity, I loves me a good list. So, of course I’m fascinated by Vanity Fair’s current issue, which features what the magazine proclaims as the 21 “greatest buildings of the last 30 years.”


“We asked the world’s leading architects, critics, and deans of architecture schools two questions: What are the five most important buildings, bridges, or monuments constructed since 1980, and what is the greatest work of architecture thus far in the 21st century?” The editors requested responses from 90 people, and 52 responded, including 11 Pritzker Architecture Prize winners, the deans of eight major architecture schools, and some journalists and critics. (Paul Goldberger reportedly picked more of the top-rated buildings than anyone else. Does this make him the keenest observer?)


A statistician would have a field day reviewing the bell curve of results: 52 lists produced some 215 nominations (out of a possible 260), revealing little consensus among the respondents. Only a dozen projects received more than a few nominations, and most got only one. The huge exception is the top choice, Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim in Bilbao, which got 28 votes, nearly three times as many as the second placer, Renzo Piano’s Menil Collection, which received 10.


As with any list, what’s missing says as much as what’s not. There are no houses, suggesting a preference for monumentality. And there’s a conspicuous shortage of exemplary green buildings. Even the few examples from Piano and Foster are not their most environmentally ambitious work. Do architects today prefer the older work of these architects to their more recent and more environmentally responsive work, such as Piano’s Tjibaou Center or Foster’s London City Hall?


In many ways, it’s a decidedly old-school list, which may be partly due to the ages of the respondents (mostly over 55, I’m guessing from a quick glance at the names), and since many of the architects surveyed have projects on the list (and voted for themselves), it’s a bit of a self-selected group. Buildings completed in the '80s and '90s garnered about 80 votes, evenly divided between the two decades, while projects after 2000 received only 16. Herzog & de Meuron’s Birds Nest stadium in Beijing got only three votes in the “since 1980” category but seven (the most) for best of the 21st century, so four of those voters believe that the single best building of the past decade doesn’t measure up against the five best from either of the previous two decades.


The most telling item might be this: Le Corbusier’s Saint-Pierre church in Firminy, France, built posthumously four years ago, received the second highest number of votes as the most significant work of this century—even though it was designed in the middle of the previous century. (It was Peter Eisenman’s only nomination in either list.) Apparently, today’s experts are nostalgic for yesterday’s icons.




Comments (6 Total)

  • Posted by: Anonymous | Time: 10:34 PM Tuesday, August 24, 2010

    @pwf, in re your befuddlement, allow me to spell it out for you: c-o-n-s-t-r-u-c-t-e-d s-i-n-c-e 1-9-8-0. And by the way, boys and girls, your reactions to the lists are far more predictable than the lists themselves. Now go play.

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: JOSE OUBRERIE ARCHITECT | Time: 3:59 PM Friday, July 09, 2010


    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: Anonymous | Time: 2:18 PM Friday, July 09, 2010

    note in the photo..steven holl votes for his own work??!!!....please...........shame on you

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: pwf | Time: 11:33 AM Wednesday, July 07, 2010

    Seems like a list drawn up from fairly recent architectural magazine subsribers - no Falling Waters? No Glass house? No Ronchamps? No Glass Towers? To what does the architecture of the 1900's owe it's life and inspiration? Where are the fabulous bridge designs from the Golden Gate to Alamillo? Very uninspired list - aught to start over with more reflection.

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: Anonymous | Time: 9:45 AM Wednesday, July 07, 2010

    i vote for the hubble space telescope as well.

    Report this as offensive

  • Posted by: Anonymous | Time: 9:01 AM Wednesday, July 07, 2010

    Not a very imaginative list, eh? First year architecture history student could have drawn it up. Though I see that Steven Holl had a wonderful suggestion (Hubble Space Telescope) in addition to his own Nelson-Atkins.

    Report this as offensive

Comment on this Post

Post your comment below. If you wish, enter a username and password though they are not required. Please read our Content Guidelines before posting.


Enter the code shown in the image

Username is optional


Enter a password if you want a username


About the Blogger

Lance Hosey

thumbnail image Contributing editor and author of ARCHITECT’s monthly Eco column, Lance Hosey, AIA, LEED AP, Hon. FIGP, is president and CEO of GreenBlue, a nonprofit and consultancy dedicated to environmental innovation and the creative redesign of industry. A registered architect, he is a former director at William McDonough + Partners. With Kira Gould, he is the co-author of Women in Green: Voices of Sustainable Design (2007). His forthcoming book, The Shape of Green: Aesthetics, Ecology, and Design, studies how form and image can enhance conservation, comfort, and community at every scale of design, from products to cities.