Project Details
- Project Name
- Tashjian Bee and Pollinator Discovery Center
- Architect
- MSR Design
- Project Types
- Education
- Project Scope
- New Construction
- Shared by
- Hanley Wood
- Project Status
- Built
This article appeared in the November 2019 issue of ARCHITECT as part of our expanded coverage of the 2019 AIA COTE Top Ten Awards.
This habitat for pollinators shows how effective management of an ecosystem can improve conditions for local species, even if that habitat is smaller than what existed before.
Located on the 1,100-acre grounds of the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, less than 20 miles southwest of Minneapolis, the Tashjian Bee and Pollinator Discovery Center forms the nucleus of a new area centered around food production and sustainable land-management strategies. With the University of Minnesota as the client, “we had a very supportive user for a sustainable project,” says MSR Design founding principal emeritus Tom Meyer, FAIA.
The locally based firm began by developing a master plan for the property: a former farm that had lain fallow for some time. There were some inherent advantages in achieving the project’s sustainability goals. For instance, all rainwater can be managed easily on-site. But there were also considerable disadvantages. In its preexisting condition, 96% of the land supported vegetation, but much of that was dominated by invasive species, and it supported little biodiversity. MSR’s plan reduced the percentage of land that supports vegetation to 64%. New landscaping is designed to transition the site back to native species and increase the effectiveness of the remaining habitats.
Part of the reduction in vegetation can be accounted for by a modest 7,530-square-foot center that MSR designed to incorporate exhibition space, a multipurpose learning lab, a demonstration apiary, and a honey extraction room that provides public education on pollinators and their role in sustainable ecosystems. The center’s configuration encourages interaction between its functions, and the interiors open onto demonstration pollinator gardens, beehives, and future food production plots.
The new building defers to the only existing on-site structure: a 120-year-old red barn. “We wanted the barn to remain at the center of the campus as a historic icon,” Meyer says. Thus, the new structure, while larger in size, is lower in height; its two-tone natural finishes are intentionally more muted than the barn’s traditional red. The center’s primary structure is long and gable-roofed and runs east–west on the site, but it’s split in the center to diminish the effect of its overall mass; the south entry, which faces the barn, is topped with
a low shed roof.
Inside are “large rooms without any interior structure,” says associate Eric Amel, AIA. A simple wood-framed, glulam truss system—sheathed in structural insulated panels—maximizes insulation while creating a soaring space that looks out to the prairie at either end. The designers doubled the number of necessary trusses—they occur every 4 feet—to create a better rhythm, a sturdier structure, and a clear reference to the framing in the historic barn.
The Discovery Center’s metal roof reprises that of the barn, while the exterior Accoya wood cladding is rendered in natural and shou sugi ban finishes that alternate yellow and black on the surface of the building. The siding is geared toward the bees in more than coloring: traditional exterior varnish is harmful to pollinators. On the interior, “we tried to hide any plastic and PVC,” Amel says, as they’re also harmful to the bee population—a sensitivity that extends to the design of the gardens, lawns, orchard, and restored prairie as well.
Using time-tested passive strategies, including a well-insulated envelope, radiant heating and cooling systems, a geothermal field, and photovoltaics, resulted in a 71% EUI reduction from the national average for the building type. A sanitary drain field helps with water conservation and obviated the need for a half-mile-long connection to the municipal sewer system.
In recent years, MSR has embraced COTE criteria as their primary approach to sustainability. “We’ve set a performance goal for the firm to have all our projects approach regenerative levels by 2026,” Meyer says. But it’s not only about energy, as the focus on local ecologies in this project demonstrates. Without fail, he says, “design is always front and center.”
Project Attributes
Architect: MSR Design
Owner: University of Minnesota | Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Location: Chaska, Minn.
Project Site: Previously developed land
Building Program Type(s): Education—General
Year of Design Completion: 2016
Year of Substantial Project Completion: 2016
Gross Conditioned Floor Area: 7,530 square feet
Gross Unconditioned Floor Area: Zero
Number of Stories: One
Project Climate Zone: ASHRAE 6A
Annual Hours of Operation: 2,236
Site Area: 121,210 square feet
Project Site Context/Setting: Rural
Cost of Construction, Excluding Furnishings: $3.25 million
Number of Residents, Occupants, and Visitors: 30,000
Project Credits
Project: Tashjian Bee and Pollinator Center, Chaska Minn.
Client/Owner: Minnesota Landscape Arboretum
Architect: MSR Design, Minneapolis . Thomas Meyer, FAIA (founding principal, principal-in-charge); Eric Amel, AIA (associate, project architect); Chris Wingate (associate, project designer); Daniel Winden, Brent Freeby, Ben Lewis, Emilie Kopp, Sam Clausen (project team)
Structural Engineer: Meyer Borgman Johnson
MEP Engineer: MEP Associates
Civil Engineer: Pierce Pini & Associates
Construction Manager/General Contractor: Loeffler Construction & Consulting
Landscape Architect: Damon Farber
Lighting Designer: MEP Associates
Technology Specialist: Elert & Associates
Museum Planner: Jim Roe Museum Planning
Detailing Consultant: James Larson
Audiovisual Consultant: Tierney Brothers
Size: 6,700 square feet
Cost: $430/square foot
Materials and Sources
Acoustical System: JohnsManville
Adhesives/Coatings/Sealants: DOW Corning; Tremco
Building Management Systems/Services: Johnson Controls
Ceilings: O’Keefe
Concrete: DayCo Concrete Co.
Exterior Wall Systems: Ray-Core
Flooring: DayCo Corete Co.; Rubble Tile
Furniture: Ideal Commercial Interiors
Glass: Viracon
Gypsum: Georgia-Pacific
HVAC: ClimateMaster; Goodin Co.; REHAU
Insulation: Dow; BASF
Lighting: Barn light Electric Co.; Lithonia; Gotham Lighting; Hydrel; Evenlite
Lighting Control Systems: Acuity Controls
Metal: TEK Steel Fabricators; Rakks; LSV Metals
Millwork: Smart Cabinetry
Paints/Finishes: Delta Millworks
Photovoltaics: SolarWorld
Plumbing/Water System: SPS
Roofing: CMG
Site/ Landscape Products: Commercial Asphalt Co; Arteka Cos.; RamyTurf Products
Structural System: Western Archrib International; Littfin
Windows/Curtainwalls/Doors: H Window Co.; Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope
Project Description
This project is a winner in the 2019 AIA COTE Top 10 Awards
FROM AIA:
The Tashjian Bee and Pollinator Discovery Center is a multi-functional public education facility that provides learning opportunities for children and adults about the lives of bees and other pollinators, their agricultural and ecological importance, and the essential, fascinating and delicious ways our human lives intersect with theirs. Serving as the outreach arm of the University of Minnesota’s Bee and Pollinator Research Lab, this new 6,700 square-foot center contains exhibit space, a multi-purpose learning lab, a demonstration apiary, and a honey extraction room. The design connects each interior program space to demonstration pollinator gardens, beehives and future food production plots.
Architect: MSR Design
Civil Engineer: Pierce Pini & Associates, Inc.
M/E/P Engineer: MEP Associates
Structural Engineer: Meyer, Borgman, and Johnson, Inc.
General Contractor: Loeffler Construction & Consulting
Landscape Architect: Damon Farber Associates
Exhibit Design: Kidzibits
Audio-Visual: Tierney Brothers
Metrics Snapshot
Community engagement: Stakeholders were involved throughout most of the process.
Walk score: 5
Percentage of the site area designed to support vegetation: 64 percent
Percentage of site area supporting vegetation before project began: 96 percent; Before the project began, the fallow farm site was dominated by invasive species including reed canary grass and aggressive brome grass. As predominately a monoculture, the site supported little biodiversity. Transitioning the site back to a suite of native species actually enhanced biodiversity and offered increased habitat capacity.
Percentage of landscaped areas covered by native or climate appropriate plants supporting native or migratory animals: 50 percent
Predicted annual consumption of potable water for all uses, excluding process water:39 percent
Is potable water used for irrigation? yes
Predicted peak month consumption of potable water for outdoor (irrigation) purposes:0.05 gallons/ sq ft
Percent of rainwater that can be managed on site: 100 percent
Water quality for any stormwater leaving the site: 97 percent of TSS removed
Cost per square foot: $432
Estimated annual operating cost reduction (identify baseline): 51 percent estimated annual operating cost reduction from a code-baseline building.
Predicted consumed energy use intensity (EUI): 22 kBtu/sq ft/yr
Predicted Net EUI: 21.6 kBtu/sq ft/yr
Predicted Net carbon emissions: 11.68 lb/sq ft/yr
Predicted reduction from national average EUI for building type: 71 percent
Predicted lighting power density: 0.78 W/sq ft
Percentage of floor area or percentage of occupant work stations with direct views of the outdoors: 100 percent
Percentage of floor area or percentage of occupant work stations within 30 feet of operable windows: 100 percent
Percentage of floor area or percentage of occupant work stations achieving adequate light levels without the use of artificial lighting: 83 percent >300 lux at 3pm March 21
Is this project a workplace? no
CO₂ intensity: 142 lbs/sq ft
Estimated carbon emissions associated with building construction: 142 lbs/sq ft
Percentage (by weight) of construction waste diverted from landfill: 76 percent
Percentage of project floor area, if any, that represents adapting existing buildings: 0 percent
Anticipated number of days the project can maintain function without utility power: 2 days
Percentage of power needs supportable by onsite power generation: 2 percent
Post-occupancy evaluation summary: Post-occupancy surveys are actively being developed to fit this project's unique user group. Traditional post-occupancy evaluations demand a reasonable set of responses by occupants who regularly use the building to generate statistically-relevant analysis and results. This project has one full time employee, three volunteer staff, and hosts a variety of student groups, adult education events, and self-guided visitors. We have developed an online survey and tested its deployment to the small staff and adult education visitors, but the number of responses is still quite small. We are in the process of shifting away from quantitative surveys towards testing small group interviews focused on a qualitative understanding of occupant comfort for the Bee Center. The anecdotal, qualitative feedback we have received is promising. The full time staff member has reported satisfaction with her environment including daylight, views, acoustics, and thermal comfort. She even said that children often prefer to sit on the radiant floor during winter programming. We are hopeful that the continuing lessons learned from developing an approach to post-occupancy for the Bee Center can be applied to the many small-scale public projects that can benefit from engaging with users well after a project is complete.