Project Details
- Project Name
- Daniels Building at One Spadina Crescent
- Architect
-
NADAAA ,ERA Architects
- Client/Owner
- University of Toronto
- Project Types
- Education
- Project Scope
- Preservation/Restoration
- Shared by
- Hanley Wood
- Project Status
- Built
This article appeared in the November 2019 issue of ARCHITECT as part of our expanded coverage of the 2019 AIA COTE Top Ten Awards.
An architecture school addition shows how careful material choices can augment even that most sustainable of design strategies: building reuse.
The imposing Gothic structure at the center of Spadina Crescent, an island in a circular intersection near downtown Toronto, has played many roles in its nearly 150-year history: At different times it has been a theological college, a military hospital, and an eye bank. It was nearly demolished in the 1960s, and for decades after suffered from neglect—despite being owned by the University of Toronto. Finally, in 2013, the university announced that it would rehabilitate and expand the building to make a new home for its John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design, hiring Boston-based firm NADAAA to lead the effort, with local firm Adamson Associates Architects as the executive architect.
From the beginning, the firms saw the brief in three parts: make the building sustainable, make it a teaching tool for design students, and knit it back into the surrounding community. The overarching goal was to leverage the existing building’s resources wherever possible, while minimizing the impact of new materials.
The revamped building is two pieces stuck together—the original, U-shaped Gothic pile and the sleek-lined addition, which nestles inside the U. ERA Architects, a local firm that specializes in historic preservation, assisted in the rehabilitation of the original structure, which involved installing a modern HVAC system and high-performance windows. The architects played to the building’s advantages, including its high ceilings and abundant natural light: “As much as possible, we wanted to maintain those existing features,” says Andrew Pruss, a principal at ERA.
NADAAA relied heavily on the original structure’s substantial south-facing thermal mass for the addition: “Because the existing building is U-shaped, is serves as insulation that holds the addition in place,” says principal Nader Tehrani. “It gives us a very conservative loss of energy.” The firm also took inspiration from the high volumes and large windows of the original building for the three-story addition—especially on the top floor. The first two floors are encased in a concrete frame, but the roof is supported by a pair of steel scissor trusses, which create broad, light-filled spaces; the floor and roof slabs are precast void slabs, which have recycled plastic spheres set inside, and use 30% less concrete than traditional slabs.
The addition gains further energy savings by limiting the amount of glazing on the east and west façades. In fact, taken together, the entire structure has a net EUI of only 62 kBtus per square foot per year—40% less than comparable academic buildings.
Given that site is surrounded on all sides by a busy traffic circle, pedestrians once took their lives in their own hands just trying to get to the building. “It was very disconnected from campus and the surrounding neighborhoods,” says Marc Ryan, a principal and co-founder of Public Work, which oversaw the landscape renovation for the project. “Part of our agenda was reconnecting it.” That meant, first of all, expanding sidewalks and pathways—including a pedestrian walkway between the old building and the addition—so that people can pass through the site. It also meant creating different green spaces around the building, including an expansive lawn on the south side and an 18-foot-tall rise covered in native plant species to the north. “The landscape is a major player in the overall design,” says Richard Lee, an associate at NADAAA. “The landscape and the building often seem to be playing off one another.” A 365-cubic-meter (96,422-gallon) cistern under the green allows the site to achieve a 100% stormwater retention rate. Several of the pathways are surfaced in a permeable bonded gravel—the sort of innovation intended to showcase the role of new technologies in sustainable design.
The entire building, in fact, offers large and small lessons for the students—from the adaptive reuse of a neglected property to the latest technologies that help minimize the use of resources in construction. “The idea of a pedagogical building is that it’s a space for teaching, but also a didactic instrument,” Tehrani says. “The whole building is an tool for them to pursue their research.”
Project Attributes
Architect: NADAAA with Adamson Associates Architects and ERA Architects
Owner: The University of Toronto/The Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design
Location: Toronto
Project Site: Historic structure or district
Building Program Type(s): Education—College/University (campus-level)
Year of Design Completion: 2017
Year of Substantial Project Completion: 2017
Gross Conditioned Floor Area: 155,000 square feet
Gross Unconditioned Floor Area: Zero
Number of Stories: Four
Project Climate Zone: ASHRAE 6
Annual Hours of Operation: 8,200
Site Area: 123,150 square feet
Project Site Context/Setting: Urban Cost of Construction, Excluding Furnishings: $51.9 million
Number of Residents, Occupants, and Visitors: 10,000
Project Credits
Project: Daniels Building at One Spadina Crescent, Toronto
Client/Owner: Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design, University of Toronto
Design Architect: NADAAA, Boston . Nader Tehrani, Katherine Faulkner, AIA (principals); Richard Lee, Tom Beresford, John Houser, Amin Tadj, Tim Wong, Alda Black, Marta Guerra, Matthew Waxman, James Juricevich, Parke Macdowell, Dane Asmussen, Laura Williams, Peter Sprowls, Noora Al Musallam, Tammy Teng, Wesley Hiatt, John Mars, Mazyar Kahali (project team)
Architect of Record: Adamson Associates Architects
Heritage Consultant: ERA Architects
Interior Designer: NADAAA
Structural Engineer: Entuitive Corporation
Mechanical Engineer: The Mitchell Partnership
Electrical Engineer: Mulvey Banani International
Plumbing Engineer: The Mitchell Partnership
Civil Engineer: A. M. Candaras Associates, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineer: Terraprobe Inc
Construction Manager/General Contractor: Eastern Construction
Landscape Architect: Public Work
Lighting Designer: Mulvey & Banani Int’l Inc
Building Envelope: Entuitive Corporation
Size: 155,000 square feet
Cost: $69 million Canadian (construction cost, including the building, site redevelopment, and landscape)
Materials and Sources
Acoustical System: Tremco; TCI Powder Coatings
Adhesives/Coatings/Sealants: Beverly Caulking
Building Management Systems/Services: Honeywell; Code Blue (intercoms); Axis Communications (cameras); Siemens (fire alarm system)
Ceilings: Lindner Group (acoustical ceiling baffles); Armstrong (drywall framing system); Sonoglass (sprayed acoustical finish)
Concrete: W.R.Meadows (concrete finishing)
Exterior Wall Systems: TAKTL (ultra high performance concrete)
Flooring: McGill Architectural Products (floor mat grille); Johnsonite (rubber base); Nora (rubber flooring)
Glass: Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope (glazing)
Gypsum: Armstrong
HVAC: Daikin/McQuay (from HTS); Price Industries; Trane; Rosemex; Klimatrol (radiant systems, snowmelt); Next Supply; Chemtreat; EFI Concepts; HTS Enginerring; Tru-Aqua; Preston Phipps; Noble Corp.; Emerson Swan
Insulation: Roxul; Johns Manville
Lighting: Metalumen, Lumium Lighting, Linear Lighting Corp., Senso Lighting, Paco Lighting, Birchwood Lighting, Lumax Lighting, Kenall Lighting, GE, Sistemalux, Custom Metalcraft, Bartco Lighting, Lucifer Lighting Co., Litelab Corp. (interior fixtures); TMS Lighting, Lumenton Lighting, GVA Lighting, Evolve, Rab Design Lighting, Iguzzini, Solera Corp. (exterior fixtures)
Lighting Control Systems: Lutron
Metal: Jakob Rope Systems (stainless mesh guard)
Millwork: LG (Hi-Macs, solid surface)
Paints/Finishes: Sika; Dulux; Glidden; PPG
Photovoltaics/Other Renewables: Vegetal I.D (green roof)
Plumbing/Water System: American Standard; Delta; Centoco; Chicago Faucets; Acorn Engineering; Stern-Williams; Bobrick
Roofing: Sarnafil; Fibergrate
Structural System: Norak Steel Constr.; Bubbledeck- Prestressed Systems
Wallcoverings: Ezobord (tackable, acoustic board)
Wayfinding: Lumacell (exit signs)
Windows/Curtainwall/Doors: Alumicor (curtainwall); IBG Canada Ltd (skylight); Daybar (hollow metal); Amstel (overhead doors); Acudor (access doors); Corflex (bi-fold lifting door)
Project Description
This project is a winner in the 2019 AIA COTE Top 10 Awards
FROM AIA:
The Daniels Building at the University of Toronto embodies a holistic approach to urban design and sustainability. As the new home for the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design, its purpose is to engage students and the broader community in dialogue about the built environment. At the center of one of Toronto’s few circular parcels, the project anchors the southwest corner of the University and opens the circle to the public after years of inaccessibility. It restores the historic building while integrating a new addition with integrated stormwater management, a green roof, voided-slab floors, and ample daylight.
Design Architect: NADAAA
Associated Architect / Architect of Record: Adamson Associates Architects
Heritage Consultant: ERA Architects
Structural: Entuitive Corporation
Building Envelope Consultant: Entuitive Corporation
Electrical / Data / AV / Lighting design: Mulvey Banani International
Mechanical / Plumbing: The Mitchell Partnership
Acoustics: Aercoustics Engineering Ltd
Civil: A. M. Candaras Associates
Landscape: Public Work
Hardware: Upper Canada Specialty Hardware
Construction Manager: Eastern Construction Co.
Select Furniture Design and Construction: Daniels Faculty
Metrics Snapshot
Community engagement: A partnership was formed with stakeholders to share in the decision-making process including development of alternatives and identification of the preferred solution.
Walk score: 99
Estimated occupants who commute via alternative transportation (biking, walking, mass transit): 95 percent
Percentage of the site area designed to support vegetation: 35 percent
Percentage of site area supporting vegetation before project began: 15 percent
Percentage of landscaped areas covered by native or climate appropriate plants supporting native or migratory animals: 100 percent
Predicted annual consumption of potable water for all uses, excluding process water: 29 gals/occupant
Is potable water used for irrigation? no
Is rainwater captured for use by the project? yes
Percent of rainwater that can be managed on site: 100 percent
Cost per square foot: $232
Predicted consumed energy use intensity (EUI): 62 kBtu/sq ft/yr
Predicted Net EUI: 62 kBtu/sq ft/yr
Predicted Net carbon emissions: 13 lb/sq ft/yr
Net carbon emissions refers to net purchased energy use (total energy use, less any energy generated on-site from renewable resources).
Predicted reduction from national average EUI for building type: 40 percent
Predicted lighting power density: 8.6 W/sq ft
Percentage of floor area or percentage of occupant work stations with direct views of the outdoors: 95 percent
Percentage of floor area or percentage of occupant work stations within 30 feet of operable windows: 80 percent
Percentage of floor area or percentage of occupant work stations achieving adequate light levels without the use of artificial lighting: 95 percent >300 lux at 3pm March 21
Is this project a workplace? no
CO₂ intensity: 58.74 lbs/sq ft
Estimated carbon emissions associated with building construction: 74 lbs/sq ft
Percentage of project floor area, if any, that represents adapting existing buildings: 40 percent
Anticipated number of days the project can maintain function without utility power: 2 days
Has a post-occupancy evaluation, including surveys of occupant comfort, been performed? Yes, the results are being computed at the time of this submission.